Перспективи розвитку електронного судочинства в Україні

Автор(и)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2025.15.19-44

Ключові слова:

електронний суд, цифровізація, Єдина судова інформаційно-телекомунікаційна система, Єдина судова інформаційно-комунікаційна система, штучний інтелект, верховенство права

Анотація

У статті розглянуто перспективи розвитку електронного судочинства в Україні, орієнтуючись на стратегічний курс України на набуття повноправного членства в Європейському Союзі та пов’язані з цим євроінтеграційні зобов’язання. Наголошено на важливості врахування під час впровадження електронного судочинства закріплених у Законі України «Про судоустрій і статус суддів» завдань (верховенство права, європейські стандарти, забезпечення кожному права на справедливий суд та поваги до інших прав і свобод), а також закріплених у ст. 129 Конституції України основних засад судочинства. Проаналізовано особливості роботи модулів Єдиної судової інформаційно-телекомунікаційної системи (ЄСІТС). Виявлено потребу у вдосконаленні окремих аспектів для забезпечення орієнтованого на користувачів функціонування системи, зокрема доповнення додатковими інструментами та інформацією електронного кабінету, збільшення різноманітності шаблонів процесуальних документів, вдосконалення інструкцій для користувачів електронного суду. Звернено увагу на потребу у вирішенні поточних проблем функціонування електронного судочинства, як-от технічні збої та загрози кібербезпеці, зазначено про потребу в належному захисті даних в електронному судочинстві, в підвищенні цифрової грамотності та забезпечення технічним обладнанням, у вдосконаленні нормативно-правового регулювання та ін. Здійснено огляд перспектив використання штучного інтелекту для забезпечення стабільної та ефективної роботи електронного судочинства. Зроблено висновок про те, що забезпечення функціонування інструментів електронного судочинства в сучасних умовах стрімкої цифровізації слід розглядати як елемент доступу до правосуддя, що, своєю чергою, є невіддільним елементом верховенства права.

Біографія автора

Дар’я Богатчук, Національний університет «Києво-Могилянська академія»

Кандидат юридичних наук, старший викладач кафедри загальнотеоретичного правознавства та публічного права факультету правничих наук, Національний університет «Києво-Могилянська академія», Київ, Україна

Посилання

  1. Association Agreement between Ukraine, of the one part, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the other part. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011#Text [in Ukrainian].
  2. Bernaziuk, Oleksandr. “Tsyfrovi tekhnolohii u pravi: tendentsii ta perspektyvy rozvytku” [“Digital Technologies in Law: Trends and Development Perspectives”]. Diss. for the degree of Doctor of Laws, Uzhhorod National University, 2021. https://www.uzhnu.edu.ua/uk/infocentre/get/33609 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Bohatchuk, Daria. “Elektronne sudochynstvo yak element dostupu do pravosuddia u strukturi verkhovenstva prava” [“Electronic Justice as an Element of Access to Justice in the Structure of the Rule of Law”]. In Zakhyst prav ta interesiv osoby v umovakh reformuvannia pryvatnoho prava v Ukraini [Protection of Rights and Interests of a Person in the Context of Reforming Private Law in Ukraine]: collection of scientific papers of roundtable (February 28, 2025), 10–6. Kyiv: National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, 2025. https://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/items/59ce39b0-5681-43c4-abb2-6b4e9b98560f [in Ukrainian].
  4. Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. 1618-IV. March 18, 2004. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text [in Ukrainian].
  5. Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine. 2747-IV. July 6, 2005. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#Text [in Ukrainian].
  6. Code of Judicial Ethics. Approved by the XI Regular Congress of Judges of Ukraine on February 22, 2013, as amended by the decision of the Congress of Judges of September 18, 2024. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/n0001415-13#Text [in Ukrainian].
  7. Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine. 1798-XII. November 6, 1991. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12#Text [in Ukrainian].
  8. Concept of UJICS. https://court.gov.ua/storage/portal/dsa/news/Kontseptsia%20ESIKS.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  9. Constitution of Ukraine. June 28, 1996. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
  10. Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE). CCJE Opinion No. 26 (2023): Moving forward: the use of assistive technology in the judiciary. CCJE(2023)3 (Strasbourg, 1 December 2023). https://hcj.gov.ua/sites/default/files/field/vysnovok_kryes_no_26_neoficiynyy_pereklad.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  11. Consultative Council of European Judges. Opinion No. 14 (2011) of the Consultative Council of European Judges “Justice and information technologies (IT)” (Strasbourg, 9 November 2011). https://hcj.gov.ua/sites/default/files/field/r_14_2011_2011_11_9.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  12. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (with Protocols) (European Convention on Human Rights). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text [in Ukrainian].
  13. Convention for the Protection of Individuals with Regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (Strasbourg, 28 January 1981). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_326#Text [in Ukrainian].
  14. Council of Europe. European Court of Human Rights. Guide on Article 6. Right to a Fair Trial (Civil Limb). https://www.echr.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Guide_Art_6_UKR.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  15. Council of the European Union. Council Conclusions ‘Access to justice — seizing the opportunities of digitalisation’. 2020/C 342 I/01, OJ C 342I, p. 1–7, Document 52020XG1014(01) (14.10.2020). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.CI.2020.342.01.0001.01.ENG&toc=OJ%3AC%3A2020%3A342I%3ATOC.
  16. Declaration of Principles building the information society: a global challenge in the new millennium (2004). Document WSIS-03/GENEVA/DOC/4-E (12 December 2003). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/533621?v=pdf.
  17. Didenko, L. “Use of Information Communications in Civil Judiciary of Germany.” Law and Society 1, part 2 (2021): 32–6. https://doi.org/10.32842/2078-3736/2021.1.2.6 [in Ukrainian].
  18. European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). Report on the Rule of Law, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 86th plenary session (Venice, 25-26 March 2011), study No. 512 / 2009, CDL-AD(2011)003rev (Strasbourg, 4 April 2011). https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2011)003rev-e.
  19. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Assessment Tool for the Operationalisation of the European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and Their Environment. CEPEJ(2023)16final, document adopted by the CEPEJ at its 41st plenary meeting, 4-5 December 2023 (4 December 2023). https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2023-16final-operationalisation-aiethical-charter-en/1680adcc9c.
  20. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). European ethical Charter on the use of Artificial Intelligence in judicial systems and their environment. Adopted at the 31st plenary meeting of the CEPEJ (Strasbourg, 3-4 December 2018). https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c.
  21. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Guidelines on electronic court filing (e-filing) and digitalisation of courts. CEPEJ(2021)15REV2, document adopted at the 37th plenary meeting of the CEPEJ, Strasbourg and online, 8 and 9 December 2021 (9 December 2021). https://old.vkksu.gov.ua/userfiles/doc/cepej-link-6.pdf.
  22. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Guidelines on videoconferencing in judicial proceedings. CEPEJ(2021)4REV4, document adopted by the CEPEJ at its 36th plenary meeting (16 and 17 June 2021) (Strasbourg, 30 June 2021). https://old.vkksu.gov.ua/userfiles/doc/news07_1.pdf.
  23. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Guidelines on how to drive change towards cyberjustice – Stock-taking of tools deployed and summary of good practices (2017), as adopted at the 28th meeting of the CEPEJ on 7 December 2016. https://edoc.coe.int/en/efficiency-of-justice/7501-guidelines-on-how-to-drive-change-towards-cyberjustice-stock-taking-of-tools-deployed-andsummary-of-good-practices.html#.
  24. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Revised roadmap for ensuring an appropriate follow-up of the CEPEJ Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environment. CEPEJ(2021)16. Document adopted at the 37th plenary meeting of the CEPEJ, Strasbourg and online, 8 and 9 December 2021 (Strasbourg, 9 December 2021). https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2021-16-en-revised-roadmap-follow-up-charter/1680a4cf2f.
  25. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Toolkit for supporting the implementation of the Guidelines on how to drive change towards Cyberjustice, as adopted at the 32th plenary meeting of the CEPEJ 13 and 14 June 2019. CEPEJ(2019)7 (Strasbourg, 14 June 2019). https://rm.coe.int/cepejtoolkit-cyberjustice-en-cepej-2019-7/168094ef3e.
  26. European Commission. Commission Staff Working Document, Ukraine 2024 Report, Accompanying the document, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 2024 Communication on EU enlargement policy, SWD(2024) 699 final (Brussels, 30.10.2024), 1-104. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/1924a044-b30f-48a2-99c1-50edeac14da1_en?filename=Ukraine%20Report%202024.pdf.
  27. European Parliament. European Parliament resolution of 18 December 2008 with recommendations to the Commission on e-Justice, 2008/2125(INI)), P6_TA(2008)0637. Official Journal of the European Union CE 45/63. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52008IP0637.
  28. Gesetz zur Einführung der elektronischen Akte in der Justiz und zur weiteren Förderung des elektronischen Rechtsverkehrs, vom 5. Juli 2017. Bundesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2017 Teil I Nr. 45, ausgegeben zu Bonn am 12. Juli 2017. https://www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/start.xav?start=%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27bgbl117s2208.pdf%27%5D#__bgbl__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27bgbl117s2208.pdf%27%5D__1736013492128.
  29. High Council of Justice. “VRP initsiiuie zapusk pilotnoho proiektu shchodo zastosuvannia shtuchnoho intelektu na bazi sudu pershoi instantsii” [“HCJ initiates the launch of a pilot project on the use of artificial intelligence on the basis of the court of first instance”]. February 10, 2021. https://www.hcj.gov.ua/news/vrp-iniciyuye-zapusk-pilotnogo-proyektu-shchodo-zastosuvannya-shtuchnogo-intelektu-nabazi-sudu [in Ukrainian].
  30. Holubieva, Nelli. Elektronne sudochynstvo: mizhnarodnyi dosvid [ Electronic Justice: International Experience]. Odesa: Feniks, 2020. http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/14039 ; https://doi.org/10.32837/11300.1403 [in Ukrainian].
  31. Horovenko, Serhii. “Dotrymannia prava na spravedlyvyi sud pid chas provedennia sudovoho zasidannia u dystantsiinomu rezhymi” [“Observance of the Right to a Fair Trial during a Court Session in Remote Mode”]. Diploma thesis, Kyiv School of Economics, 2021. https://kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Sergiy-Gorovenko-Master-Thesis.docx.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  32. Hyliaka, Oleh. “Okremi aspekty funktsionuvannia elektronnoho pravosuddia v Ukraini” [“Certain Aspects of the Functioning of e-Justice in Ukraine”]. In Modern Challenges and Current Problems of Judicial Reform in Ukraine: Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference (Chernivtsi, 16 October 2020) [eds.: O. Shcherbaniuk (Chair), L. Bzova (Executive Secretary) et al.], 16–18. Kyiv: VAITE, 2020. https://law.chnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Zbirnyk-16.10.20.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  33. Instruktsiia korystuvacha pidsystemy “Elektronnyi sud” Yedynoi sudovoi informatsiino-telekomunikatsiinoi systemy [User Manual of the Electronic Court Subsystem of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System]. Approved by the Order of the State Enterprise ‘ЦСС’ 74-OD, 22.09.2021. https://wiki.court.gov.ua/images/e/e4/Instruktsiia_korystuvacha_Elektronnoho_sudu_YeSITS.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  34. Instruktsiia z vykorystannia instrumentiv poshuku v Bazi pravovykh pozytsii Verkhovnoho Sudu [Instructions for using the search tools in the Supreme Court Legal Position Database]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ibUAxcKT-_rsVNSvRuSBN4a4K3R5TrRd/view [in Ukrainian].
  35. Instruktsiia z vykorystannia pidsystemy “Elektronnyi cabinet” Yedynoi sudovoi informatsiinotelekomunikatsiinoi systemy [Instruction on the use of the ‘Electronic Cabinet’ subsystem of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System]. Approved by the Order of the State Enterprise ‘ЦСС’ 74-OD, 22.09.2021. https://wiki.court.gov.ua/images/c/cc/Instruktsiia_korystuvacha_Elektronnoho_kabinetu_YeSITS.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  36. Irkha, Yurii. “Suchasni pidkhody do rozuminnia poniattia «dostup do pravosuddia»” [“Modern Approaches to Understanding the Concept of ‘Access to Justice’”]. In Modern Challenges and Current Problems of Judicial Reform in Ukraine: Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference (Chernivtsi, 16 October 2020), [eds.: O. Shcherbaniuk (Chair), L. Bzova (Executive Secretary) et al.], 26–30. Kyiv: VAITE, 2020. https://law.chnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Zbirnyk-16.10.20.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  37. Ivaniuta, Nataliia. “Electronic Justice in Civil Cases: National and European Experience.” Law and Society 4 (2020): 72–6. https://doi.org/10.32842/2078-3736/2020.4.10 [in Ukrainian].
  38. Justiz-Portal Hamburg. “Elektronische Akte in der Justiz.” Justiz-Portal Hamburg, Stand: 16.10.2024. Quelle: Behörde für Justiz und Verbraucherschutz. https://justiz.hamburg.de/e-justice/elektronischeakte-in-der-justiz.
  39. Kaniuka, Natalia. “Administrative and Legal Provision of E-Justice in Ukraine.” PhD diss. abstract, West Ukrainian National University, 2023. https://www.wunu.edu.ua/svr/svr_D/kanyka/aref_Kanyka.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  40. Khanyk-Pospolitak, Roksolana. “Elektronne pravosuddia: suchasni yevropeiski standarty v tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy” [“E-justice: Modern European Standards in Civil Proceedings of Ukraine”]. In International Scientific and Practical Conference ‘Ukraine on the Way to Europe: Reform of Civil Procedure Legislation’: collection of scientific papers, 52–5. Kyiv: National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, 2017. https://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/20bf6159-18e0-4375-bec3-6624c8510f29/content [in Ukrainian].
  41. Kölner Anwaltverein. “Justitia ist blind — auch wenn sie eine VR-Brille trägt?!” https://www.koelneranwaltverein.de/kontakt/.
  42. Korshun, Anatolii. “Pryntsyp hlasnosti i vidkrytosti diialnosti orhaniv sudovoi vlady ta mekhanizm yoho realizatsii: teoretyko-pravova kharakterystyka” [“The Principle of Publicity and Openness of the Judiciary and the Mechanism of its Implementation: Theoretical and Legal Characteristics”]. Diss. for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in specialty 081 — Law. Dnipro State University of Internal Affairs of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, 2021 [in Ukrainian].
  43. Kovalova, Anastasiia. “Prezentovana nova kontseptsiia Elektronnoho sudu, stvorena za pidtrymky USAID” [“A new concept of the Electronic Court created with the support of USAID is presented”]. Glavkom, November 11, 2024. https://glavcom.ua/news/prezentovana-nova-kontseptsija-elektronnoho-sudustvorena-za-pidtrimki-usaid-1029103.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com [in Ukrainian].
  44. Kravtsov, S., Pravnyk S., and Moshura L. “Electronic Justice as a Modern Trend.” Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal 4 (2021): 224–28. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2021-4/53 [in Ukrainian].
  45. Natsionalna ekonomichna stratehiia na period do 2030 roku [National Economic Strategy for the period up to 2030]. Approved by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of 3 March 2021, No. 179. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/179-2021-%D0%BF#Text [in Ukrainian].
  46. Parliamentary Assembly. Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights. Justice by algorithm — the role of artificial intelligence in policing and criminal justice systems. Report, Doc. 15156, Rapporteur Mr. Boriss Cilevičs, Latvia. SOC (01.10.2020). https://pace.coe.int/en/files/28723/html.
  47. Parliamentary Assembly. Resolution 2341 (2020). Need for democratic governance of artificial intelligence. Text adopted by the Standing Committee, acting on behalf of the Assembly (22.10.2020). https://pace.coe.int/en/files/28803/html.
  48. Paskar, Aurika. “Dematerialisation of the Judicial Procedure: Reality or Abstraction?” Journal of Kyiv University of Law 1 (2021): 191–94. https://chasprava.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/653/621 [in Ukrainian].
  49. Plan zakhodiv z vykonannia rekomendatsii Yevropeiskoi Komisii, predstavlenykh u Zviti pro prohres Ukrainy v ramkakh Paketa rozshyrennia Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu 2023 roku [Action Plan for the Implementation of the Recommendations of the European Commission Presented in the Report on Ukraine’s Progress under the EU Enlargement Package 2023]. Approved by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on 9 February 2024, No. 133-p. https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-zatverdzhennia-planu-zakhodiv-zvykonannia-rekomendatsii-ievropeiskoi-komisii-predstavlenykh-u-t90224?fbclid=IwAR2wBTVoHXQtpZtuJshkIRK1twU55Dcn4Uo1eqaEwbgO319OtNvw935tTrc [in Ukrainian].
  50. Polozhennia pro poriadok funktsionuvannia okremykh pidsystem Yedynoi sudovoi informatsiinotelekomunikatsiinoi systemy [Regulations on the Procedure for the Functioning of Certain Subsystems of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System]. Approved by the decision of the High Council of Justice of 17 August 2021, No. 1845/0/15-21. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v1845910-21#Text [in Ukrainian].
  51. Rabko, Tetiana. “Oboviazok storony u vlasnomu Elektronnomu kabineti vidslidkovuvaty rukh ta stan rozghliadu dokumentiv u sudi” [“The Obligation of a Party to Track the Movement and Status of Documents Consideration in Court in Own Electronic Cabinet”]. Higher School of Advocacy of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, December 17, 2024. https://www.hsa.org.ua/lectors/rabko-tetyana/articles/oboviazok-storoni-u-vlasnomu-elektronnomu-kabineti-vidslidkovuvati-rux-ta-stan-rozgliadudokumentiv-u-sudi [in Ukrainian].
  52. ———. Elektronne sudochynstvo. Suchasni vyklyky ta realii [Electronic Court Proceedings. Modern Challenges and Realities]. Higher School of Advocacy of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, Kyiv, 2024. https://www.hsa.org.ua/lectors/rabko-tetyana/articles/posibnik-elektronne-sudocinstvo-sucasnivikliki-ta-realiyi [in Ukrainian].
  53. Recommendation (2020) 1 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on the human rights impacts of algorithmic systems. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 1373rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies on 8 April 2020. https://www.vkksu.gov.ua/sites/default/files/field/file/eng/20%20Rekomendatsiia%20%282020%29%201%20Komitetu%20Ministriv%20derzhavam-chlenam%20shchodo%20vplyvu%20alhorytmichnykh.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  54. Recommendation (84) 5 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on the principles of civil procedure designed to improve the functioning of justice. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 367th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies on 28 February 1984. https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fold.vkksu.gov.ua%2Fuserfiles%2Fdoc%2Fperelikdokumentiv%2Frek-84.doc&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK [in Ukrainian].
  55. Recommendation CM/Rec(2009)1 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on electronic democracy (e-democracy). Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 February 2009 at the 1049th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies. https://www.coe.int/t/dgap/democracy/Activities/GGIS/CAHDE/2009/RecCM2009_1_and_Accomp_Docs/Recommendation%20CM_Rec_2009_1E_FINAL_PDF.pdf.
  56. Recommendation No. R (95) 11 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states concerning the selection, processing, presentation and archiving of court decisions in legal information retrieval systems. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 543rd meeting of the Minister’s Deputies on 11 September 1995. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/R_95_11_1995_09_11.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  57. Recommendation Rec (2001) 2 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states concerning the design and re-design of court systems and legal information systems in a cost effective manner. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 743rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies on February 28, 2001. https://hcj.gov.ua/sites/default/files/field/rec_2001_2_2001_02_28.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  58. Recommendation Rec (2001) 3 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on the delivery of court and other legal services to the citizen through the use of new technologies. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 743rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies on 28 February 2001. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/Rec_2001_3_2001_02_28.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  59. Recommendation Rec (2003) 14 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on the interoperability of information systems in the justice sector. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 851st meeting of Ministers’ Deputies on 9 September 2003. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/Rec_2003_14_2003_09_09.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  60. Recommendation Rec (2003) 15 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on archiving of electronic documents in the legal sector. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 851st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies on 9 September 2003. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/Rec_2003_15_2003_09_09.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  61. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1–88. Document 32016R0679. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng.
  62. Rusanova, Iryna. “Suchasni problemy zaprovadzhennia elektronnoho sudochynstva v Ukraini” [“Modern Problems of Implementation of Electronic Justice in Ukraine”]. Public Law 3 (43) (2021): 41–9. https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/19284/1/41-49.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  63. Sakara, Nataliia. Problema dostupnosti pravosuddia u tsyvilnykh spravakh [The Problem of Accessibility of Justice in Civil Cases]. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2010 [in Ukrainian].
  64. Skochylias-Pavliv, O. “The Current State of Electronic Justice in Ukraine.” Kyiv Law Journal 1 (2024): 207–212. https://kyivchasprava.kneu.in.ua/index.php/kyivchasprava/article/view/425/411 [in Ukrainian].
  65. Starchenko, A. “Electronic Civil Litigation: Impact of War and Post-War Development.” Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal 6 (2024): 119–22. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2024-6/28 [in Ukrainian].
  66. Sudovo-yurydychna hazeta. “Modernizatsiia YeSITS pid zahrozoiu — Derzhavna sudova administratsiia shukaie novi dzherela finansuvannia” [“Modernization of the UJITS is under threat — the State Judicial Administration is looking for new sources of funding”]. Sudovo-yurydychna hazeta, Sud info [Judicial and Legal Newspaper, Court Info], February 17, 2025. https://sud.ua/uk/news/publication/323305-modernizatsiya-esits-pod-ugrozoy-gosudarstvennaya-sudebnaya-administratsiya-ischet-novyeistochniki-finansirovaniya [in Ukrainian].
  67. Sudovo-yurydychna hazeta. “Tekhnichnyi audyt moduliv YeSITS zaversheno: podrobytsi” [“Technical Audit of the EJITS Modules Completed: Details”]. Sudovo-yurydychna hazeta, Sud info [Judicial and Legal Newspaper, Court Info], December 25, 2023. https://sud.ua/uk/news/sud-info/289023-tekhnicheskiy-audit-moduley-esits-zavershen-podrobnosti [in Ukrainian].
  68. Sudovo-yurydychna hazeta. “Yak bude vyhliadaty modernizovana YeSITS: kontseptsiia Derzhavnoi sudovoi administratsii” [“How the modernised UJITS will look like: the concept of the State Judicial Administration”]. Sudovo-yurydychna hazeta, Sud info [ Judicial and Legal Newspaper, Court Info], July 20, 2024. https://sud.ua/uk/news/publication/305836-kak-budet-vyglyadet-modernizirovannayaesits-kontseptsiya-gosudarstvennoy-sudebnoy-administratsii [in Ukrainian].
  69. Supreme Court in the panel of judges of the Administrative Cassation Court. Case 120/17546/23, administrative proceedings K/990/30953/24. Resolution, November 12, 2024. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/123060147 [in Ukrainian].
  70. Supreme Court. “Znakhodte pravovi pozytsii” [“Find Legal Positions”]. https://lpd.court.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
  71. The Concept of Artificial Intelligence Development in Ukraine. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine 1556-r. Approved December 2, 2020. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-2020-%D1%80#Text [in Ukrainian].
  72. Tsymbal, P., Omelchuk L., and Kalinichenko L. “Napriamy vdoskonalennia elektronnoho sudochynstva v Ukraini” [“Directions for Improving Electronic Justice in Ukraine”]. International Legal Bulletin: Actual Problems of the Present (Theory and Practice) 4–5 (8–9) (2017): 150–55. https://journals.dpu.kyiv.ua/index.php/law/article/view/25/25 [in Ukrainian].
  73. Tykhonova, Daria. “Realizatsiia v umovakh voiennoho stanu elektronnoho administratyvnoho sudochynstva” [“Implementation of Electronic Administrative Proceedings under Martial Law”]. European Perspectives 3 (2023): 24–9. https://doi.org/10.32782/EP.2023.3.3 [in Ukrainian].
  74. Vasylieva-Shalamova, Zh., and Kozhemiakina K. “Electronic Litigation in the Civil Process of Ukraine: Development Trends and Impact of Guarantine.” Juridical Scientific and Electronic Journal 3 (2022): 78–81. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2022-3/15 [in Ukrainian].
  75. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Pro dostup do sudovykh rishen [On Access to Court Decisions]. Law of Ukraine 3262-IV. Adopted December 22, 2005. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3262-15#Text [in Ukrainian].
  76. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv [On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges]. Law of Ukraine 1402-VIII. Adopted June 2, 2016. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text [in Ukrainian].
  77. World Justice Project. “WJP Rule of Law Index.” Ukraine Overall Score, 2024. https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/country/2024/Ukraine.
  78. Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen [Unified Stated Register of Court Decisions]. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua [in Ukrainian].
  79. Zalnieriute, Monika, Lyria Bennett Moses, and George Williams. “The Rule of Law and Automation of Government Decision-Making”. Forthcoming, Modern Law Review 82(3), UNSW Law Research Paper No. 19–14 (2019): 1–26. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3348831 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3348831.

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2025-05-25

Як цитувати

Богатчук, Д. (2025). Перспективи розвитку електронного судочинства в Україні. Наукові записки НаУКМА. Юридичні науки, 15, 19–44. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2025.15.19-44

Номер

Том 15 (2025): Наукові записки НаУКМА. Юридичні науки

Розділ

Статті

Ліцензія

Авторське право (c) 2025 Daria Bohatchuk

Creative Commons License

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Автори зберігають за собою авторські права на твір на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, котра дозволяє іншим особам вільно поширювати опублікований твір з обов’язковим посиланням на його авторів та його першу публікацію в цьому журналі.

Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного поширення твору в тому вигляді, в якому його було опубліковано в журналі (наприклад, розміщувати роботу в електронному репозитарії установи або публікувати у складі монографії), за умови збереження посилання на його першу публікацію.

Політика журналу дозволяє розміщення авторами в мережі Інтернет (наприклад, у репозитаріях установ або на особистих веб-сайтах) рукопису роботи, як до подання його до редакції, так і під час його редакційного опрацювання, оскільки це сприяє виникненню продуктивної наукової дискусії та позитивно позначається на оперативності та динаміці цитування опублікованої роботи (див. The Effect of Open Access).