Перспективи розвитку електронного судочинства в Україні

Автор(и)

  • Дар'я Петрівна Богатчук Національний університет «Києво-Могилянська академія», Україна

Ключові слова:

електронний суд, цифровізація, Єдина судова інформаційно-телекомунікаційна система, штучний інтелект

Анотація

У статті розглянуто перспективи розвитку електронного судочинства в Україні, орієнтуючись на стратегічний курс України на набуття повноправного членства в Європейському Союзі та пов’язані з цим євроінтеграційні зобов’язання. Наголошено на важливості врахування при впровадженні електронного судочинства закріплених в Законі України «Про судоустрій і статус суддів» завдань (верховенство права, європейські стандарти, забезпечення кожному права на справедливий суд та поваги до інших прав і свобод), а також закріплених у статті 129 Конституції України основних засад судочинства. Проаналізовано особливості роботи модулів Єдиної судової інформаційно-телекомунікаційної системи (ЄСІТС). Відзначено потребу у вдосконаленні окремих аспектів для забезпечення орієнтованого на користувачів функціонування системи, зокрема, доповнення додатковими інструментами редагування текстів в електронному кабінеті, збільшення різноманітності шаблонів процесуальних документів, вдосконалення інструкцій для користувачів електронного суду. Звернено увагу на потребу у вирішенні поточних проблем функціонування електронного судочинства, таких як технічні збої та загрози кібербезпеці, зазначено про потребу в належному захисті даних в електронному судочинстві, в підвищенні цифрової грамотності та забезпечення технічним обладнанням, у вдосконаленні нормативно-правового регулювання та ін. Здійснено огляд перспектив використання штучного інтелекту для забезпечення стабільної та ефективної роботи електронного судочинства. Зроблено висновок про те, що забезпечення функціонування інструментів електронного судочинства в сучасних умовах стрімкої цифровізації слід розглядати як елемент доступу до правосуддя, що, у свою чергу, є невід’ємною складовою верховенства права.

Посилання

  1. Bernaziuk, Oleksandr. «Tsyfrovi tekhnolohii u pravi: tendentsii ta perspektyvy rozvytku». Dysertatsiia na zdobuttia naukovoho stupenia doktora yurydychnykh nauk, Uzhhorodskyi natsionalnyi universytet, Uzhhorod, 2021. https://www.uzhnu.edu.ua/uk/infocentre/get/33609. [Bernaziuk, Oleksandr. ‘Digital Technologies in Law: Trends and Development Perspectives’. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Laws, Uzhhorod National University, Uzhhorod, 2021] [in Ukrainian].
  2. Bohatchuk D.P., «Elektronne sudochynstvo yak element dostupu do pravosuddia u strukturi verkhovenstva prava». Kruhlyi stil «Zakhyst prav ta interesiv osoby v umovakh reformuvannia pryvatnoho prava v Ukraini», Kyiv: Natsionalnyi universytet «Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia», 28 liutoho 2025 roku (podano do zbirnyka materialiv kruhloho stolu) [Bohatchuk D.P., “Electronic Justice as an Element of Access to Justice in the Structure of the Rule of Law”. Roundtable “Protection of Rights and Interests of a Person in the Context of Reforming Private Law in Ukraine”, Kyiv: National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, February 28, 2025 (submitted to the roundtable proceedings)].
  3. Council of the European Union. Council Conclusions ‘Access to justice – seizing the opportunities of digitalisation’, 2020/C 342 I/01, OJ C 342I, p. 1–7. Document 52020XG1014(01) (14.10.2020). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.CI.2020.342.01.0001.01.ENG&toc=OJ%3AC%3A2020%3A342I%3ATOC.
  4. Declaration of Principles building the information society: a global challenge in the new millennium (2004). Document WSIS-03/GENEVA/DOC/4-E (12 December 2003). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/533621?v=pdf.
  5. Didenko L.V. «Vykorystannia informatsiinykh komunikatsii u tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi Nimechchyny», Pravo i suspilstvo 1, chastyna 2 (2021): 32-36. http://www.pravoisuspilstvo.org.ua/archive/2021/1-2_2021/8.pdf. [Didenko, L.V., ‘The use of information communications in civil proceedings in Germany’, Law and Society 1, part 2 (2021): 32-36] [in Ukrainian].
  6. “Elektronische Akte in der Justiz”. Justiz-Portal Hamburg, Stand: 16.10.2024. Quelle: Behörde für Justiz und Verbraucherschutz. https://justiz.hamburg.de/e-justice/elektronische-akte-in-der-justiz.
  7. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Assessment Tool for the Operationalisation of the European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and Their Environment. CEPEJ(2023)16final, document adopted by the CEPEJ at its 41st plenary meeting, 4-5 December 2023 (4 December 2023). https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2023-16final-operationalisation-ai-ethical-charter-en/1680adcc9c.
  8. European Commission. Commission Staff Working Document. Ukraine 2024 Report. Accompanying the document. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. 2024 Communication on EU enlargement policy, SWD(2024) 699 final (Brussels, 30.10.2024), 1-104. https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/1924a044-b30f-48a2-99c1-50edeac14da1_en?filename=Ukraine%20Report%202024.pdf.
  9. European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). Report on the Rule of Law, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 86th plenary session (Venice, 25-26 March 2011). Study No. 512 / 2009, CDL-AD(2011)003rev (Strasbourg, 4 April 2011). https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2011)003rev-e.
  10. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). European ethical Charter on the use of Artificial Intelligence in judicial systems and their environment. Adopted at the 31st plenary meeting of the CEPEJ (Strasbourg, 3-4 December 2018). https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c.
  11. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Guidelines on electronic court filing (e-filing) and digitalisation of courts, CEPEJ(2021)15REV2, document adopted at the 37th plenary meeting of the CEPEJ, Strasbourg and online, 8 and 9 December 2021 (9 December 2021). https://old.vkksu.gov.ua/userfiles/doc/cepej-link-6.pdf
  12. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Guidelines on videoconferencing in judicial proceedings. CEPEJ(2021)4REV4, document adopted by the CEPEJ at its 36th plenary meeting (16 and 17 June 2021) (Strasbourg, 30 June 2021). https://old.vkksu.gov.ua/userfiles/doc/news07_1.pdf
  13. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Guidelines on how to drive change towards cyberjustice - Stock-taking of tools deployed and summary of good practices (2017), as adopted at the 28th meeting of the CEPEJ on 7 December 2016. https://edoc.coe.int/en/efficiency-of-justice/7501-guidelines-on-how-to-drive-change-towards-cyberjustice-stock-taking-of-tools-deployed-and-summary-of-good-practices.html#.
  14. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Revised roadmap for ensuring an appropriate follow-up of the CEPEJ Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environment. CEPEJ(2021)16. Document adopted at the 37th plenary meeting of the CEPEJ, Strasbourg and online, 8 and 9 December 2021 (Strasbourg, 9 December 2021). https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2021-16-en-revised-roadmap-follow-up-charter/1680a4cf2f.
  15. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). Toolkit for supporting the implementation of the Guidelines on how to drive change towards Cyberjustice, as adopted at the 32th plenary meeting of the CEPEJ 13 and 14 June 2019. CEPEJ(2019)7 (Strasbourg, 14 June 2019) https://rm.coe.int/cepej-toolkit-cyberjustice-en-cepej-2019-7/168094ef3e.
  16. European Parliament. European Parliament resolution of 18 December 2008 with recommendations to the Commission on e-Justice, 2008/2125(INI)). P6_TA(2008)0637. Official Journal of the European Union CE 45/63. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52008IP0637.
  17. Gesetz zur Einführung der elektronischen Akte in der Justiz und zur weiteren Förderung des elektronischen Rechtsverkehrs, vom 5. Juli 2017. Bundesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2017 Teil I Nr. 45, ausgegeben zu Bonn am 12. Juli 2017. https://www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/start.xav?start=%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27bgbl117s2208.pdf%27%5D#__bgbl__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27bgbl117s2208.pdf%27%5D__1736013492128.
  18. Holubieva N.Yu. Elektronne sudochynstvo: mizhnarodnyi dosvid, monohrafiia [elektronne vydannia] (Odesa, Feniks, 2020) 204 s. http://dspace.onua.edu.ua/handle/11300/14039. DOI: 10.32837/11300.1403. [Holubieva N.Y., Electronic Justice: International Experience, monograph [electronic edition] (Odesa: Phoenix, 2020) 204 p.] [in Ukrainian].
  19. Horovenko, Serhii. «Dotrymannia prava na spravedlyvyi sud pid chas provedennia sudovoho zasidannia u dystantsiinomu rezhymi». Dyplomna robota, Kyivska shkola ekonomiky, Kyiv, 2021. https://kse.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Sergiy-Gorovenko-Master-Thesis.docx.pdf. [Horovenko, Serhii. ‘Observance of the Right to a Fair Trial during a Court Session in Remote Mode’. Diploma thesis, Kyiv School of Economics, Kyiv, 2021)] [in Ukrainian].
  20. Hospodarskyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy, № 1798-XII. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), 1992, № 6, st.56 (Kyiv, 6.11.1991). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1798-12#Text. [Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine, No. 1798-XII. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VVR), 1992, No. 6, Article 56 (Kyiv, 6.11.1991)] [in Ukrainian].
  21. Hyliaka O.S. «Okremi aspekty funktsionuvannia elektronnoho pravosuddia v Ukraini», U Suchasni vyklyky ta aktualni problemy sudovoi reformy v Ukraini: Materialy IV Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Chernivtsi, 16 zhovtnia 2020 r.) [redkol.: O. V. Shcherbaniuk (holova), L.H. Bzova (vidpov. sekr.) ta in.] (Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo VAITE, 2020). 356 s., 16-18. https://law.chnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Zbirnyk-16.10.20.pdf. [Hilyaka O.S. ‘Certain aspects of the functioning of e-justice in Ukraine’. In Modern Challenges and Current Problems of Judicial Reform in Ukraine: Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference (Chernivtsi, 16 October 2020) [eds: O. Shcherbaniuk (Chair), L. Bzova (Executive Secretary) and others] (Kyiv: VAITE Publishing House, 2020). 356 pp., 16-18] [in Ukrainian].
  22. Instruktsiia z vykorystannia instrumentiv poshuku v Bazi pravovykh pozytsii Verkhovnoho Sudu. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ibUAxcKT-_rsVNSvRuSBN4a4K3R5TrRd/view [Instructions for using the search tools in the Supreme Court Legal Position Database] [in Ukrainian].
  23. Instruktsiia z vykorystannia pidsystemy «Elektronnyi kabinet» Yedynoi sudovoi informatsiino-telekomunikatsiinoi systemy, zatverdzhena nakazom DP «TsSS» №74-OD vid 22.09.2021 roku. https://wiki.court.gov.ua/images/c/cc/Instruktsiia_korystuvacha_Elektronnoho_kabinetu_YeSITS.pdf [Instruction on the use of the ‘Electronic Cabinet’ subsystem of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System, approved by the Order of the State Enterprise ‘ЦСС’ No. 74-OD of 22.09.2021] [in Ukrainian].
  24. Instruktsiia korystuvacha pidsystemy «Elektronnyi sud» Yedynoi sudovoi informatsiino-telekomunikatsiinoi systemy, zatverdzhena nakazom DP «TsSS» №74-OD vid 22.09.2021 roku. https://wiki.court.gov.ua/images/e/e4/Instruktsiia_korystuvacha_Elektronnoho_sudu_YeSITS.pdf. [User Manual of the Electronic Court Subsystem of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System, approved by the Order of the State Enterprise ‘ЦСС’ No. 74-OD of 22.09.2021] [in Ukrainian].
  25. Irkha Yu.B. «Suchasni pidkhody do rozuminnia poniattia «dostup do pravosuddia». U Suchasni vyklyky ta aktualni problemy sudovoi reformy v Ukraini: Materialy IV Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Chernivtsi, 16 zhovtnia 2020 r.) [redkol.: O.V. Shcherbaniuk (holova), L.H. Bzova (vidpov. sekr.) ta in.] (Kyiv, Vydavnytstvo VAITE, 2020) 356 s., 26-30. https://law.chnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Zbirnyk-16.10.20.pdf. [Irkha Y.B. ‘Modern Approaches to Understanding the Concept of “Access to Justice”’. In Modern Challenges and Current Problems of Judicial Reform in Ukraine: Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference (Chernivtsi, 16 October 2020) [eds: O. Shcherbaniuk (Chair), L. Bzova (Executive Secretary) and others] (Kyiv: VAITE Publishing House, 2020) 356 pp., 26-30] [in Ukrainian].
  26. Ivaniuta N.V. «Elektronne pravosuddia v tsyvilnykh spravakh: natsionalnyi ta yevropeiskyi dosvid». Pravo i suspilstvo 4 (2020): 72-76. http://www.pravoisuspilstvo.org.ua/archive/2020/4_2020/12.pdf. [Ivaniuta N.V. ‘E-justice in civil cases: national and European experience’. Law and Society 4 (2020): 72-76] [in Ukrainian].
  27. Kaniuka, Natalia. «Administratyvno-pravove zabezpechennia elektronnoho sudochynstva v Ukraini». Avtoreferat dysertatsii na zdobuttia naukovoho stupenia kandydata yurydychnykh nauk, Zakhidnoukrainskyi natsionalnyi universytet, Ternopil, 2023. https://www.wunu.edu.ua/svr/svr_D/kanyka/aref_Kanyka.pdf. [Kaniuka, Nataliia. ‘Administrative and Legal Support of Electronic Court Proceedings in Ukraine’. PhD academic abstract, Western Ukrainian National University, Ternopil, 2023] [in Ukrainian].
  28. Kodeks administratyvnoho sudochynstva Ukrainy, № 2747-IV. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), 2005, № 35-36, № 37, st.446 (Kyiv, 6.07.2005). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2747-15#Text [Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine, No. 2747-IV. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VVR), 2005, No. 35-36, No. 37, Art. 446 (Kyiv, 6.07.2005)] [in Ukrainian].
  29. Kodeks suddivskoi etyky, zatverdzhenyi XI cherhovym zizdom suddiv Ukrainy 22 liutoho 2013 roku, zi zminamy, vnesenymy zghidno z rishenniam zizdu suddiv vid 18 veresnia 2024 roku. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/n0001415-13#Text. [The Code of Judicial Ethics approved by the XI Regular Congress of Judges of Ukraine on February 22, 2013, as amended by the decision of the Congress of Judges of September 18, 2024] [in Ukrainian].
  30. Kölner Anwaltverein. «Justitia ist blind – auch wenn sie eine VR-Brille trägt?!». https://www.koelner-anwaltverein.de/kontakt/.
  31. Khanyk-Pospolitak R.Yu. «Elektronne pravosuddia: suchasni yevropeiski standarty v tsyvilnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy». U Mizhnarodna naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia «Ukraina na shliakhu do Yevropy: reforma tsyvilnoho protsesualnoho zakonodavstva»: zbirnyk naukovykh prats (Kyiv: Natsionalnyi universytet «Kyievo-Mohylianska akademiia», fakultet pravnychykh nauk, 2017): 52-55. https://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/20bf6159-18e0-4375-bec3-6624c8510f29/content [Khanyk-Pospolitak R.Y. ‘E-justice: Modern European Standards in Civil Proceedings of Ukraine’, In International Scientific and Practical Conference ‘Ukraine on the Way to Europe: Reform of Civil Procedure Legislation’: collection of scientific papers (Kyiv: National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Faculty of Law, 2017), 52-55]. [in Ukrainian].
  32. «Koncepcija JeSIKS», https://court.gov.ua/storage/portal/dsa/news/Kontseptsia%20ESIKS.pdf [The concept of UJICS] [in Ukrainian].
  33. Konstytutsiia Ukrainy. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), 1996, № 30, st. 141. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text [Constitution of Ukraine. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VVR), 1996, No. 30, p. 141] [in Ukrainian].
  34. Konsultatyvna rada yevropeiskykh suddiv. Vysnovok KRIeS № 26 (2023): Rukhaiuchys vpered: vykorystannia asystyvnykh tekhnolohii u sudochynstvi. CCJE(2023)3 (Strasburh, 1.12.2023), https://hcj.gov.ua/sites/default/files/field/vysnovok_kryes_no_26_neoficiynyy_pereklad.pdf. [Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE). CCJE Opinion No. 26 (2023): Moving forward: the use of assistive technology in the judiciary. CCJE(2023)3 (Strasbourg, 1 December 2023)]. [in Ukrainian].
  35. Konsultatyvna rada yevropeiskykh suddiv. Vysnovok KRIeS № 14 (2011) «Sudochynstvo ta informatsiini tekhnolohii» (Strasburh, 9 lystopada 2011 roku). https://hcj.gov.ua/sites/default/files/field/r_14_2011_2011_11_9.pdf. [Consultative Council of European Judges. Opinion No. 14 (2011) of the Consultative Council of European Judges “Justice and information technologies (IT)” (Strasbourg, 9 November 2011)] [in Ukrainian].
  36. Kontseptsiia rozvytku shtuchnoho intelektu v Ukraini, skhvalena rozporiadzhenniam Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 2 hrudnia 2020 r. № 1556-r. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-2020-%D1%80#Text. [The Conception of Artificial Intelligence Development in Ukraine, approved by the Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of December 2, 2020, No. 1556-r] [in Ukrainian].
  37. Konventsiia pro zakhyst osib u zviazku z avtomatyzovanoiu obrobkoiu personalnykh danykh (Strasburh, 28 sichnia 1981 roku) https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_326#Text. [The Convention for the Protection of Individuals with Regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (Strasbourg, 28 January 1981)] [in Ukrainian].
  38. Konventsiia pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod (z protokolamy) (Yevropeiska konventsiia z prav liudyny), https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_004#Text. [Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (with Protocols) (European Convention on Human Rights)] [in Ukrainian].
  39. Korshun, Anatolii. «Pryntsyp hlasnosti i vidkrytosti diialnosti orhaniv sudovoi vlady ta mekhanizm yoho realizatsii: teoretyko-pravova kharakterystyka». Dysertatsiia na zdobuttia naukovoho stupenia doktora filosofii za spetsialnistiu 081 – Pravo. Dnipropetrovskyi derzhavnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav Ministerstva vnutrishnikh sprava Ukrainy, Dnipro, 2021. [Korshun, Anatolii, “The Principle of Publicity and Openness of the Judiciary and the Mechanism of its Implementation: Theoretical and Legal Characteristics”. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in specialty 081 – Law. Dnipro State University of Internal Affairs of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Dnipro, 2021] [in Ukrainian].
  40. Kovalova, Anastasiia. «Prezentovana nova kontseptsiia Elektronnoho sudu, stvorena za pidtrymky USAID». Hlavkom, 1.11.2024. https://glavcom.ua/news/prezentovana-nova-kontseptsija-elektronnoho-sudu-stvorena-za-pidtrimki-usaid-1029103.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com [Kovaleva, Anastasia. ‘A new concept of the Electronic Court created with the support of USAID is presented’. Glavkom, 1.11.2024] [in Ukrainian].
  41. Kravtsov S.O., Pravnyk S.O., Moshura L.V. «Elektronne sudochynstvo yak suchasnyi trend». Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal 4 (2021): 224-228. http://www.lsej.org.ua/4_2021/55.pdf [Kravtsov S.O., Pravnyk S.O. Moshura L.V. ‘Electronic Justice as a Modern Trend’. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal 4 (2021) 224-228] [in Ukrainian].
  42. «Modernizatsiia YeSITS pid zahrozoiu – Derzhavna sudova administratsiia shukaie novi dzherela finansuvannia», Sudovo-yurydychna hazeta, Sud info, 17.02.2025, https://sud.ua/uk/news/publication/323305-modernizatsiya-esits-pod-ugrozoy-gosudarstvennaya-sudebnaya-administratsiya-ischet-novye-istochniki-finansirovaniya [“Modernization of the UJITS is under threat - the State Judicial Administration is looking for new sources of funding”, Judicial and Legal Newspaper, Court Info, 17.02.2025] [in Ukrainian].
  43. Natsionalna ekonomichna stratehiia na period do 2030 roku, zatverdzhena postanovoiu Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 3 bereznia 2021 r. № 179. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/179-2021-%D0%BF#Text [National Economic Strategy for the period up to 2030, approved by the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of 3 March 2021, No. 179] [in Ukrainian].
  44. Parliamentary Assembly. Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights. Justice by algorithm – the role of artificial intelligence in policing and criminal justice systems. Report, Doc. 15156. Rapporteur Mr. Boriss Cilevičs, Latvia. SOC (01.10.2020). https://pace.coe.int/en/files/28723/html.
  45. Parliamentary Assembly. Resolution 2341 (2020). Need for democratic governance of artificial intelligence, text adopted by the Standing Committee, acting on behalf of the Assembly (22.10.2020). https://pace.coe.int/en/files/28803/html.
  46. Paskar A.L. «Dematerializatsiia sudovoi protsedury: realnist chy abstraktsiia?». Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava 1 (2021): 191-194. https://chasprava.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/653/621 [Paskar, A.L. ‘Dematerialisation of the Judicial Procedure: Reality or Abstraction?’ Journal of Kyiv University of Law 1 (2021) 191-194] [in Ukrainian].
  47. Plan zakhodiv z vykonannia rekomendatsii Yevropeiskoi Komisii, predstavlenykh u Zviti pro prohres Ukrainy v ramkakh Paketa rozshyrennia Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu 2023 roku, zatverdzhenyi rozporiadzhenniam Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 09 liutoho 2024 r. № 133-r. https://www.kmu.gov.ua/npas/pro-zatverdzhennia-planu-zakhodiv-z-vykonannia-rekomendatsii-ievropeiskoi-komisii-predstavlenykh-u-t90224?fbclid=IwAR2wBTVoHXQtpZtuJshkIRK1twU55Dcn4Uo1eqaEwbgO319OtNvw935tTrc. [Action Plan for the Implementation of the Recommendations of the European Commission Presented in the Report on Ukraine's Progress under the EU Enlargement Package 2023, approved by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on 9 February 2024, No. 133-p] [in Ukrainian].
  48. Polozhennia pro poriadok funktsionuvannia okremykh pidsystem Yedynoi sudovoi informatsiino-telekomunikatsiinoi systemy, zatverdzhene rishenniam Vyshchoi rady pravosuddia vid 17 serpnia 2021 roku № 1845/0/15-21. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v1845910-21#Text [Regulations on the Procedure for the Functioning of Certain Subsystems of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System, approved by the decision of the High Council of Justice of 17 August 2021, No. 1845/0/15-21] [in Ukrainian].
  49. Rabko, Tetiana. Elektronne sudochynstvo. Suchasni vyklyky ta realii. Posibnyk (Vyshcha shkola advokatury NAAU, Kyiv, 2024), https://www.hsa.org.ua/lectors/rabko-tetyana/articles/posibnik-elektronne-sudocinstvo-sucasni-vikliki-ta-realiyi. [Rabko, Tetyana. Electronic Court Proceedings. Modern Challenges and Realities. Manual (Higher School of Advocacy of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, Kyiv, 2024)] [in Ukrainian].
  50. Rabko, Tetiana. «Oboviazok storony u vlasnomu Elektronnomu kabineti vidslidkovuvaty rukh ta stan rozghliadu dokumentiv u sudi» (Vyshcha shkola advokatury NAAU, 17.12.2024). https://www.hsa.org.ua/lectors/rabko-tetyana/articles/oboviazok-storoni-u-vlasnomu-elektronnomu-kabineti-vidslidkovuvati-rux-ta-stan-rozgliadu-dokumentiv-u-sudi [Rabko, Tetyana. ‘The Obligation of a Party to Track the Movement and Status of Documents Consideration in Court in Own Electronic Cabinet’ (Higher School of Advocacy of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, 17.12.2024)] [in Ukrainian].
  51. Rada Yevropy. Yevropeiskyi sud z prav liudyny. Posibnyk zi statti 6. Pravo na spravedlyvyi sud (Tsyvilna chastyna). https://www.echr.com.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Guide_Art_6_UKR.pdf. [Council of Europe. European Court of Human Rights. Guide on Article 6. Right to a Fair Trial (Civil Limb)] [in Ukrainian].
  52. Recommendation CM/Rec(2009)1 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on electronic democracy (e-democracy), adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 February 2009 at the 1049th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies. https://www.coe.int/t/dgap/democracy/Activities/GGIS/CAHDE/2009/RecCM2009_1_and_Accomp_Docs/Recommendation%20CM_Rec_2009_1E_FINAL_PDF.pdf.
  53. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1–88. Document 32016R0679. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng.
  54. Rekomendatsiia Rec (2003) 15 Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy derzhavam-chlenam shchodo arkhivatsii elektronnykh dokumentiv u pravovomu sektori, ukhvaleno Komitetom Ministriv Rady Yevropy na 851 zasidanni zastupnykiv ministriv 9 veresnia 2003 roku. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/Rec_2003_15_2003_09_09.pdf. [Recommendation Rec (2003) 15 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on archiving of electronic documents in the legal sector, adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 851st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies on 9 September 2003] [in Ukrainian].
  55. Rekomendatsiia No. R (95) 11 Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy derzhavam-chlenam shchodo vidboru, obrobky, predstavlennia ta arkhivatsii sudovykh rishen u pravovykh informatsiino-poshukovykh systemakh, ukhvaleno Komitetom Ministriv Rady Yevropy na 543 zasidanni zastupnykiv ministriv 11 veresnia 1995 roku. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/R_95_11_1995_09_11.pdf. [Recommendation No. R (95) 11 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states concerning the selection, processing, presentation and archiving of court decisions in legal information retrieval systems, adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 543rd meeting of the Minister’s Deputies on 11 September 1995] [in Ukrainian].
  56. Rekomendatsiia (2020) 1 Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy derzhavam-chlenam shchodo vplyvu alhorytmichnykh system na prava liudyny, ukhvalena Komitetom Ministriv Rady Yevropy na 1373 zasidanni Zastupnykiv Ministriv 8 kvitnia 2020 roku. https://www.vkksu.gov.ua/sites/default/files/field/file/eng/20%20Rekomendatsiia%20%282020%29%201%20Komitetu%20Ministriv%20derzhavam-chlenam%20shchodo%20vplyvu%20alhorytmichnykh.pdf. [Recommendation (2020) 1 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on the human rights impacts of algorithmic systems, adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 1373rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies on 8 April 2020] [in Ukrainian].
  57. Rekomendatsiia Rec (2001) 3 Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy derzhavam-chlenam shchodo nadannia hromadianam sudovykh ta inshykh yurydychnykh posluh z vykorystanniam novitnikh tekhnolohii, ukhvaleno Komitetom Ministriv Rady Yevropy na 743 zasidanni zastupnykiv ministriv 28 liutoho 2001 roku. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/Rec_2001_3_2001_02_28.pdf. [Recommendation Rec (2001) 3 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on the delivery of court and other legal services to the citizen through the use of new technologies, adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 743rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies on 28 February 2001]. [in Ukrainian].
  58. Rekomendatsiia Rec (2001) 2 Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy derzhavam-chlenam shchodo pobudovy ta perebudovy sudovykh system ta pravovoi informatsii v ekonomichnyi sposib, ukhvaleno Komitetom Ministriv Rady Yevropy na 743 zasidanni zastupnykiv ministriv 28 liutoho 2001 roku. https://hcj.gov.ua/sites/default/files/field/rec_2001_2_2001_02_28.pdf. [Recommendation Rec (2001) 2 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states concerning the design and re-design of court systems and legal information systems in a cost effective manner, adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 743rd meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies on February 28, 2001] [in Ukrainian].
  59. Rekomendatsiia (84) 5 Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy derzhavam-chlenam shchodo pryntsypiv tsyvilnoho sudochynstva, spriamovanykh na vdoskonalennia funktsionuvannia pravosuddia, ukhvalena Komitetom Ministriv Rady Yevropy na 367 zasidanni zastupnykiv ministriv 28 liutoho 1984 roku. https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fold.vkksu.gov.ua%2Fuserfiles%2Fdoc%2Fperelik-dokumentiv%2Frek-84.doc&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK [Recommendation (84) 5 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on the principles of civil procedure designed to improve the functioning of justice, adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 367th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies on 28 February 1984] [in Ukrainian].
  60. Rekomendatsiia Rec (2003) 14 Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy derzhavam-chlenam shchodo funktsionalnoi sumisnosti informatsiinykh system u sferi yustytsii, ukhvaleno Komitetom Ministriv Rady Yevropy na 851 zasidanni zastupnykiv ministriv 9 veresnia 2003 roku. https://supreme.court.gov.ua/userfiles/Rec_2003_14_2003_09_09.pdf. [Recommendation Rec (2003) 14 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member states on the interoperability of information systems in the justice sector, adopted by the Committee of Ministers at the 851st meeting of Ministers’ Deputies on 9 September 2003] [in Ukrainian].
  61. Rusanova I.O. «Suchasni problemy zaprovadzhennia elektronnoho sudochynstva v Ukraini». Publichne pravo No. 3 (43) (2021), 41-49. https://dspace.nlu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/19284/1/41-49.pdf [Rusanova I.O. ‘Modern Problems of Implementation of Electronic Justice in Ukraine’, Public Law No. 3 (43) (2021), 41-49] [in Ukrainian].
  62. Sakara N.Yu. Problema dostupnosti pravosuddia u tsyvilnykh spravakh. Monohrafiia (Kharkiv, Pravo, 2010) 256 s. [Sakara N.Y., The Problem of Accessibility of Justice in Civil Cases. Monograph (Kharkiv, Pravo, 2010) 256 p.] [in Ukrainian].
  63. Skochylias-Pavliv O.V. «Suchasnyi stan elektronnoho sudochynstva v Ukraini», Kyivskyi chasopys prava 1 (2024): 207-212. https://kyivchasprava.kneu.in.ua/index.php/kyivchasprava/article/view/425/411 [Skochylias-Pavliv O.V. ‘The Current State of Electronic Justice in Ukraine’. Kyiv Law Journal 1 (2024): 207-212] [in Ukrainian].
  64. Starchenko A.A. «Elektronne tsyvilne sudochynstvo: vplyv viiny ta povoiennyi rozvytok», Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal 6 (2024): 119-122. http://www.lsej.org.ua/6_2024/30.pdf. [Starchenko, A.A. ‘Electronic Civil Proceedings: the Impact of War and Post-War Development’. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal 6 (2024): 119-122] [in Ukrainian].
  65. «Tekhnichnyi audyt moduliv YeSITS zaversheno: podrobytsi». Sudovo-yurydychna hazeta, Sud info, 25.12.2023. https://sud.ua/uk/news/sud-info/289023-tekhnicheskiy-audit-moduley-esits-zavershen-podrobnosti. [‘Technical Audit of the EJITS Modules Completed: Details’. Judicial and Legal Newspaper, Court Info, 25.12.2023] [in Ukrainian].
  66. Tsymbal P.V., Omelchuk L.V., Kalinichenko L.L. «Napriamy vdoskonalennia elektronnoho sudochynstva v Ukraini». U Mizhnarodnyi yurydychnyi visnyk: aktualni problemy suchasnosti (teoriia ta praktyka) 4–5 (8–9) (2017) 150-155. https://journals.dpu.kyiv.ua/index.php/law/article/view/25/25 [Tsymbal P.V., Omelchuk L.V., Kalinichenko L.L. ‘Directions for Improving Electronic Justice in Ukraine’. In International Legal Bulletin: Actual Problems of the Present (Theory and Practice) 4-5 (8-9) (2017) 150-155] [in Ukrainian].
  67. Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy, No. 1618-IV. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), 2004, No. 40-41, 42, st.492 (Kyiv, 18.03.2004). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text [Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, No. 1618-IV. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VVR), 2004, No. 40-41, 42, Art. 492 (Kyiv, 18.03.2004)] [in Ukrainian].
  68. Tykhonova D.S. «Realizatsiia v umovakh voiennoho stanu elektronnoho administratyvnoho sudochynstva», Yevropeiski perspektyvy 3 (2023): 24-29. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371357789_REALIZACIA_V_UMOVAH_VOENNOGO_STANU_ELEKTRONNOGO_ADMINISTRATIVNOGO_SUDOCINSTVA [Tikhonova, D.S. ‘Implementation of electronic administrative proceedings under martial law’, European Perspectives 3 (2023): 24-29] [in Ukrainian].
  69. Uhoda pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yevropeiskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoi storony. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011#Text [Association Agreement between Ukraine, of the one part, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the other part] [in Ukrainian].
  70. Vasylieva-Shalamova Zh.V., Kozhemiakina K.S. «Elektronne sudochynstvo u tsyvilnomu protsesi Ukrainy: tendentsii rozvytku ta vplyv karantynu». Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal 3 (2022): 78-81. http://www.lsej.org.ua/3_2022/15.pdf. [Vasylieva-Shalamova Zh.V. Kozhemiakina K.S. ‘Electronic proceedings in the civil process of Ukraine: development trends and the impact of quarantine’. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal 3 (2022): 78-81] [in Ukrainian].
  71. Verkhovnyi Sud. «Znakhodte pravovi pozytsii». https://lpd.juscourt.com/home/all?key=7jl4wtkhi315&page=1 [Supreme Court, Find Legal Positions] [in Ukrainian].
  72. Verkhovnyi Sud u skladi kolehii suddiv Kasatsiinoho administratyvnoho sudu. Postanova vid 12 lystopada 2024 roku. Sprava №120/17546/23, administratyvne provadzhennia № K/990/30953/24 (Kyiv, 2024) https://reyestr.court.gov.ua/Review/123060147 [Supreme Court in the panel of judges of the Administrative Cassation Court. Resolution of 12 November 2024. Case No. 120/17546/23, administrative proceedings No. K/990/30953/24 (Kyiv, 2024)] [in Ukrainian].
  73. Vyshcha rada pravosuddia. «VRP initsiiuie zapusk pilotnoho proiektu shchodo zastosuvannia shtuchnoho intelektu na bazi sudu pershoi instantsii» (Vyshcha rada pravosuddia, 10.02.2021) https://www.hcj.gov.ua/news/vrp-iniciyuye-zapusk-pilotnogo-proyektu-shchodo-zastosuvannya-shtuchnogo-intelektu-na-bazi-sudu [High Council of Justice. ‘HCJ initiates the launch of a pilot project on the use of artificial intelligence on the basis of the court of first instance’ (High Council of Justice, 10.02.2021)] [in Ukrainian].
  74. “WJP Rule of Law Index”. World Justice Project. Ukraine. Ukraine Overall Score, 2024. https://worldjusticeproject.org/rule-of-law-index/country/2024/Ukraine.
  75. «Yak bude vyhliadaty modernizovana YeSITS: kontseptsiia Derzhavnoi sudovoi administratsii» (Sudovo-yurydychna hazeta, Sud info, 20.07.2024). https://sud.ua/uk/news/publication/305836-kak-budet-vyglyadet-modernizirovannaya-esits-kontseptsiya-gosudarstvennoy-sudebnoy-administratsii [‘How the modernised UJITS will look like: the concept of the State Judicial Administration’ (Judicial and Legal Newspaper, Court Info, 20.07.2024)] [in Ukrainian].
  76. Yedynyi derzhavnyi reiestr sudovykh rishen. https://reyestr.court.gov.ua [Unified Stated Register of Court Decisions] [in Ukrainian].
  77. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro dostup do sudovykh rishen» vid 22 hrudnia 2005 roku № 3262-IV. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), 2006, № 15, st. 128 (m. Kyiv, 22.12.2005) https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3262-15#Text [The Law of Ukraine ‘On Access to Court Decisions’ of 22 December 2005, No. 3262-IV. Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (VVR), 2006, No. 15, Art. 128 (Kyiv, 22.12.2005)] [in Ukrainian].
  78. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv». Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), 2016, № 31, st.545. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text [Law of Ukraine ‘On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges’. Bulletin of the VerkhovnaRada of Ukraine (VVR), 2016, no. 31, p. 545] [in Ukrainian].
  79. Zalnieriute, Monika, Lyria Bennett Moses, and George Williams. «The Rule of Law and Automation of Government Decision-Making» (1.01.2019, 14.03.2019). Forthcoming, Modern Law Review 82(3), UNSW Law Research Paper No. 19-14 (2019): 1-26. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3348831 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3348831.

##submission.downloads##

Опубліковано

2025-05-25

Як цитувати

Богатчук, Д. П. (2025). Перспективи розвитку електронного судочинства в Україні. Наукові записки НаУКМА. Юридичні науки, 15. вилучено із https://nrplaw.ukma.edu.ua/article/view/326333

Номер

Том 15 (2025): Наукові записки НаУКМА. Юридичні науки

Розділ

Статті

Ліцензія

Авторське право (c) 2025 Дар'я Петрівна Богатчук

Creative Commons License

Ця робота ліцензується відповідно до Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Автори зберігають за собою авторські права на твір на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, котра дозволяє іншим особам вільно поширювати опублікований твір з обов’язковим посиланням на його авторів та його першу публікацію в цьому журналі.

Автори мають право укладати самостійні додаткові угоди щодо неексклюзивного поширення твору в тому вигляді, в якому його було опубліковано в журналі (наприклад, розміщувати роботу в електронному репозитарії установи або публікувати у складі монографії), за умови збереження посилання на його першу публікацію.

Політика журналу дозволяє розміщення авторами в мережі Інтернет (наприклад, у репозитаріях установ або на особистих веб-сайтах) рукопису роботи, як до подання його до редакції, так і під час його редакційного опрацювання, оскільки це сприяє виникненню продуктивної наукової дискусії та позитивно позначається на оперативності та динаміці цитування опублікованої роботи (див. The Effect of Open Access).